"Hi, my name is Rhama. I love to write, which implies my love to reading. I'm kinda obsessed with Movies, works as an IT guy at day, and developing Android app and iOS app otherwise. Oh, yeah, I also kinda wished to escape the cubicle farm."

Jan 17, 2009

saw_vI’ve never really considered myself as a fan of Saw series or the subgenre it hauled, “torture porn” Contradictorily, I’ve always managed to saw all of its unrated version of the franchise. Given that the mood is right, though.

Now, it is a fairly fair predicament that whenever a movie-goer went to a film called “Saw” with or without a Roman number as its suffix, she would be fully aware what she’d expect the most from that film. Gore, Blood, and brooding in magnificent steam-punk machinery designed to inflict as much pain as possible without killing its victim straight-away.

I actually liked the first Saw. There’s some nuance of substance behind all those delicate traps, bloods and all and the film’s final twist is even worked for me. At the very least, I was mildly curious of Saw II at the time. But after three films, 53,291 characters, and 1,209 traps later, I was lost. Utterly lost. I mean, I could remember the first Saw film, vaguely remember Saw II, but totally confused about which is which in third and fourth Saw film and therefore in my point of view, I degraded Saw into a serie that was just that, a “torture porn”, not much of a substance – I’m even not sure if it is there anymore – and exists merely to satisfy my curiosity on Blood, Gore, and Pain. Thus, with that frame of mind I went into “Saw V”

In a saw-verse timeline, “Saw V” begins immediately after Saw IV, where (I think) Jigsaw was found dead on a surgeon table. The film has clearly two plot lines, each intermingled in its timeframe and narration. Plot “A” – Agent Strahm (Scott Patterson) tracking down the loose-ends of the now-dead Jigsaw (Tobin Bell), and Plot “B” – The game a la Jigsaw where a bunch of unimportant people involved in “lessons” about something or another. Well, you know, typical to the Saw series. Now, if you’ve seen the last film you know something that Strahm doesn’t which is that another survivor from Saw IV, an established hero, Mark Hoffman (Costas Mandylor) is a villain, and apparently, another Jigsaw’s accomplice. But Strahm doesn’t know this. Therefore, during the film, Strahm spent most of his screen-time flipping through files, and muttering – talking – to himself as an understanding dawned upon him, about say, “You two has been working together!” and then, a flashback scene showing that these two are indeed working together. It happens at least three times with similar procedure (flipping, muttering, flashback). Mark Hoffman however, spent mostly in his car seat in parking lot. I’ve lost interest to him since the last film so it doesn’t really matter about what’s he doing, anyway. The plot “B”, well, that’s just an obligatory part from the film-makers. Otherwise, it just won’t do to call it “Saw V”

Comparing against the previous two films, even if the gore level was considerably lacking, “Saw V” has a distinction that at the very least, it’s make sense. Like I said, I was oblivious to who’s who, and why’s why from the third and fourth film. “Saw V” with its rather abundance amount of no-cloak-and-dagger flashback scenes with Jigsaw serves more like a conclusion chapter, an explanation footnote against the previous two films or perhaps even against the entire series. Although of course, given the bad writing (Scott Patterson, talking to himself, “I know it, you sonofabich”, flashback, switch to plot “B”, shoot the main villain waiting in his car in the parking lot, rinse, repeat, and final scene where its “twist” should be visible from miles away), it is not nearly enough even if I had lowered my standard when I went into this film.

My rating: ** / **** With this film, the “Saw” legacy was “cleaned” once again and could therefore be restarted anew for its sixth installment without tampering much with the current chronology. The only question is wether Jigsaw’s apprentice could live up to the task of replacing Jigsaw or we’d still see Tobin Bell in the future. I’d wager for the latter.

See this post in Bahasa Indonesia

Jan 14, 2009

  • What’s This ‘Struts 2’ Category is All About - First of all, some background. It is safe to say that some, if not all, friends of mine are already knew about one of my dreams, one of my desires to have a book published under my name. You would know already, had I somehow manages to published one as (1) I would never stop […] »
  • Burn After Reading (2008) - Even if the Coens has been consistently making superior quality movies for twenty years, I’d say that their names were only shown in the map of many after the delightful success of “No Country for Old Men” Their immediate follow-up to that success was therefore was quite anticipated for not only their names, for they […] »

Jan 13, 2009

  • Slumdog Millionaire (2008) - Slumdog Millionaire is winner of 2009 Golden Globe Awards for Best Score, Best Screenplay, Best Director and Best Drama. I scanned a lot of news daily, and movie news are just happened to be one of them. Therefore, when I quick scanned news about “Slumdog Millionaire”, my initial thought was that the film was yet […] »

Jan 12, 2009

  • Golden Globe 2009 (News) - Now I won’t bore you with details, head to other sites more dedicated to know more about the Complete winners, photos »

Jan 10, 2009

  • Ong Bak 2 (2008) - Ong Bak 2 is a sequel to Ong Bak in a title only as I vaguely remembered that the first Ong Bak was set in modern Thailand, while in this film, it is clearly sets in a land ruled by feudal landlords where violence and raging war for land-expansion is a common. Thus, no previous […] »
  • The Curious Case of Benjamin Button (2008) - When the first buzz about The Curious Case of Benjamin Button begins to surface in the internet, about a reverse-aging case of one called Benjamin Button (Brad Pitt), in which he was born with wrinkles and physical attributes that suites a man in his 80 and “grows younger” physically while he grows older mentally as […] »

Jan 09, 2009

  • Up and Running - Finally, I could say that this blog is “up and running” and unless you’re using IE 6, in which case you’re going to see a two-or-three pixels gap on the right, this blog should work. One last problem I tackled this evening was about the offset of an element which made IE singularly displays the […] »

Jan 08, 2009

  • Cross-Browser Tests - Okay, as I’ve told in my previous post, this site is currently under development, and I’ve only managed to test the looks and the feels of this site under Firefox and Safari extensively. In order to tests them properly in gut-wrenched-bloated-prone-to-errors Internet Explorer, I had to turn on my Toshiba, or hijacking one of my […] »

Jan 06, 2009

  • Why Another Guide? - If you played games, casual or otherwise, there’s a significant chance that you might know about this little game from Bethesda Softworks. Fallout 3. An RPG game mixed in with a little FPS thrown in, sets in a huge post-appocalypse Washington D.C. (I had to assume that it was based on the actual Washington D.C. […] »